INVISTA NO SEU SUCESSO:
One user inquired about the validity of their Step 1 scheduling permit after rescheduling within the same eligibility period. The consensus confirmed that the scheduling permit remains valid despite rescheduling with Prometric. This emphasizes the importance of understanding procedural details to avoid unnecessary stress during preparation .
In terms of study methodologies, another user with an upcoming exam in five days, and NBME scores ranging from 68-72%, sought advice on whether to proceed with the test. The community suggested focusing on reviewing incorrect UWorld questions and utilizing resources like Amboss pass calculator and Mehlman arrows PDF to strengthen weaker areas . For those feeling overwhelmed by knowledge gaps, the recommendation is to concentrate on high-yield sections using materials like First Aid (FA), Pathoma, and Sketchy Pharm and Micro. Utilizing Anki for spaced repetition and watching HY Guru videos were also advised to consolidate understanding .
For those who have faced setbacks, such as failing the Step 1 exam, it is crucial to reassess and refine study strategies. Utilizing Mehlman PDFs and Bootcamp materials while focusing on consistent study habits and achieving higher mock scores can provide a structured approach to overcoming previous failures . Additionally, checking results efficiently is vital; users should navigate to the FSMB home page, click on the uniform application, select a state, and check the examination history to find their results .
Lastly, addressing specific study content, such as formula-based questions and updates on pharmacology, is essential. For biostatistics and other critical areas, knowing formulas like CO=SVxHR can aid in reasoning through questions, even if not directly tested . For pharmacology, it remains crucial to study adverse effects and contraindications as these continue to be relevant in exams despite updates focusing more on mechanisms of action . Utilizing advanced tools like GPT-4 to explain complex concepts from First Aid can also streamline the study process and enhance comprehension .
The original poster (OP) asked if the Step 1 scheduling permit remains the same when rescheduling within the same eligibility period. This is a common concern for test-takers managing their exam dates.
A respondent clarified that the scheduling permit issued by USMLE does not change when rescheduling with Prometric within the same eligibility period. This confirmation helped ease OP’s concerns about logistical complications in adjusting their exam date.
The OP, worried about an upcoming Step 1 exam, shared their NBME scores ranging from 68-72% and a Free 120 score of 62%. They sought advice on whether they should proceed with the test.
Respondents reassured the OP by discussing the reliability of various score predictors. They suggested using tools like AMBOSS’s percentage pass calculator and emphasized reviewing incorrect UWorld questions to focus on weak areas. Suggestions also included using resources like Mehlman arrows PDFs for targeted review and addressing overall test performance rather than individual block scores.
OP expressed anxiety about their upcoming exam, highlighting incomplete preparation in certain subjects and decreasing scores on practice questions. They asked for strategic advice with only 40 days left.
The community provided various strategies, such as stopping timed mode practice to focus on understanding, revising First Aid (FA) more thoroughly, and possibly avoiding certain resources like Pathoma. Recommendations included balancing question practice with content review, particularly in high-yield subjects like immunology and microbiology. Consistent advice emphasized systematic review and thorough understanding over mere repetition.
The OP shared their frustration and anger after failing Step 1 as reported by FCVS, despite feeling confident post-exam. They discussed plans for immediate and intense study to retake the exam.
Respondents advised reevaluating study strategies, focusing on consistent and effective preparation rather than last-minute cramming. Suggestions included identifying and addressing fundamental study flaws, revisiting NBME and Free 120 scores for accurate self-assessment, and maintaining motivation. Encouragement and practical study tips, such as using targeted resources and taking adequate breaks, were common themes.
A US IMG asked for guidance on checking Step 1 results after the permit disappeared.
A respondent guided OP to the FSMB home page, advising them to use the Uniform Application and check the examination history to access their results. This direct approach helped the OP and others in similar situations.
The OP expressed impatience and frustration about waiting for their Step 1 results, asking if anyone who tested on 6/3 had received their results.
Comments revealed a common anxiety among test-takers waiting for results. Respondents shared similar experiences, noting the typical waiting period and advising patience. They reassured OP that results are typically released within the expected timeframe.
A non-U.S. IMG discussed failing their first attempt at Step 1 and sought advice on whether to continue pursuing this path and how it might affect their application.
Encouragement from the community focused on resilience and strategic reattempts. Respondents shared personal experiences of failing and later passing by improving their study methods, such as completing UWorld and using Anki for First Aid. Practical advice included analyzing weaknesses from the score report, using targeted resources like Sketchy and Pathoma, and seeking strong recommendation letters to bolster future applications.
OP announced the release of Step 1 results on FCVS and celebrated their pass.
Numerous community members shared their own success stories and congratulated each other. Discussion also covered the waiting period for those who hadn't received their results yet, fostering a supportive environment. Guidance on how to check results on FCVS for IMGs was also reiterated.
OP inquired about the process to check Step 1 results on FCVS, sharing a screenshot of the examination history without clear pass/fail status.
Respondents explained the detailed steps to navigate FCVS for result checking, including selecting the Uniform Licensure Application and choosing any state to access the examination history. Clarifications were provided for IMGs and those unfamiliar with the process, easing their navigation and anxiety.
OP expressed their struggle with the difficulty of the Step 1 exam taken that day, feeling overwhelmed by the low-yield and tricky questions.
Respondents shared similar sentiments about the exam's difficulty and low-yield content. They advised focusing on understanding core concepts and not getting discouraged by challenging questions. The shared experiences helped normalize the stress and uncertainty felt by test-takers.
OP asked about the prevalence of formula-based questions on Step 1, aside from high-yield biostatistics formulas.
Respondents confirmed that while specific formulas like sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV are high-yield, knowing other formulas can aid in reasoning through related concepts. Emphasis was placed on understanding foundational formulas to tackle integrated questions effectively.
OP inquired whether the 6 drug reaction pages in First Aid could be skipped based on an update focusing on drug mechanisms over specific pharmacotherapy details.
Despite the update, respondents advised not skipping the drug reaction pages entirely. They highlighted that UWorld still includes questions on adverse effects and contraindications, indicating their relevance. The consensus was to balance understanding drug mechanisms with awareness of high-yield adverse effects and interactions.
OP, an IMG, faced difficulties checking their Step 1 results on FCVS and sought clarification on the process.
Detailed instructions were provided for navigating FCVS, emphasizing the steps to reach the examination history. Respondents reassured OP that the absence of immediate status did not imply failure and advised patience and correct procedural follow-up.
OP asked if the disappearance of their Step 1 permit indicated that results would be posted soon.
Confirmation was given that the disappearance of the scheduling permit typically precedes the release of results. This response provided clarity and set expectations for OP and others monitoring their permit status.
OP, a retaker, asked where to expect their Step 1 results and mentioned their permit had disappeared.
Respondents confirmed that the permit disappearance is a precursor to receiving results, typically via email around 7 AM. Advice included monitoring the ECFMG website and maintaining patience as results are processed.
OP, scoring well on practice tests, felt they had content gaps and sought advice on whether to focus on UWorld or high-yield review in the final weeks.
The consensus was to trust practice test scores, indicating readiness. Suggestions included balancing UWorld questions with targeted high-yield reviews to solidify weaker areas. Taking the new Free 120 to assess performance and confidence closer to the exam date was also recommended.
OP expressed anxiety after taking the Step 1 exam, highlighting numerous flagged questions and feelings of uncertainty about their performance.
Many shared similar feelings of post-exam anxiety, emphasizing the commonality of such experiences. Encouragement focused on trusting preparation and practice test scores, as well as recognizing that a certain number of flagged questions is normal. Practical advice included reviewing experimental question information and focusing on the broader content grasp.
OP shared a negative experience with their Step 1 exam taken on 6/11, feeling unprepared for the content encountered.
Responses echoed similar feelings of unpreparedness among test-takers. Advice centered on reviewing high-yield topics and maintaining confidence despite a challenging exam. Emphasis was placed on trusting overall preparation and seeking support from peers.
OP, anxious after taking Step 1, reflected on missed questions and felt overwhelmed by uncertainty about their performance.
Respondents reassured OP by sharing similar post-exam anxieties and eventual success. Practical tips included reviewing known correct answers for reassurance, understanding the role of experimental questions, and maintaining a balanced perspective. Emphasis was on trusting practice test scores and staying positive.
OP praised the utility of GPT-4o in studying for Step 1, highlighting its ability to explain complex concepts efficiently.
Respondents agreed on the effectiveness of using AI tools like GPT-4o to supplement study materials. They shared experiences of how such tools save time and enhance understanding, suggesting various ways to integrate AI assistance into study routines for more efficient learning.
OP, with 79% of UWorld completed and a 68% average, sought advice on next steps before their July 10 exam, considering Mehlman PDFs and reviewing incorrect questions.
Advice included completing UWorld and focusing on NBMEs for realistic evaluation. Respondents emphasized the importance of reviewing incorrect questions throughout the study process and using resources like Mehlman PDFs for targeted high-yield review. Balancing these approaches was recommended to cover content gaps effectively.
A Canadian medical student inquired whether to take Step 1 or Step 2 first, considering their clerkship schedule and the MCCQE1 exam.
The consensus was to take Step 1 first, as Step 2 builds on its content. Respondents shared personal experiences, highlighting the benefits of completing Step 1 for foundational knowledge before tackling Step 2 and other exams like MCCQE1. The pass/fail nature of Step 1 also provided a strategic advantage.