INVISTA NO SEU SUCESSO:
Preparation for USMLE Step 2 involves leveraging resources like UWorld, NBMEs (9–15), CMS Forms, and high-yield materials like Divine Intervention Podcasts or Inner Circle flashcards. Success hinges on understanding weaknesses by thoroughly analyzing incorrect answers, reviewing core concepts, and focusing on practical applications through CMS forms and targeted question banks. Structured approaches like scheduled assessments (NBMEs followed by UWSA) and starting with small steps, such as reviewing familiar material, can help build momentum.
Addressing emotional challenges is critical; many users share struggles with nervous breakdowns or self-doubt. Strategies include joining supportive communities like Discord servers, using incremental study techniques, and even spiritual practices like prayer. These approaches help alleviate stress and maintain focus. For more specialized queries, free tools like student memberships for AAFP FM questions or Amboss can provide specific practice for challenging areas like biostatistics or ethics, while user-shared analogies (e.g., Ach receptors in myasthenia crisis) simplify difficult topics.
Ultimately, confidence-building strategies, practical study methods, and community engagement are pivotal in preparing for Step 2. Emphasis is placed on starting small, tracking progress through NBME scores (targeting at least 220), and consistently addressing content gaps with reliable, high-yield resources.
Resources:
UWorld (Step 2 and Shelf review, biostat questions, ambulatory care, and FM-specific questions).
CMS Forms (recommended by multiple users, particularly forms 5, 7, and 8).
NBMEs (Forms 9–15, with specific orders like 9, 10, UWSA1, 11–15, UWSA2).
Divine Intervention Podcasts (organized via a shared Excel file).
Inner Circle and Mehlman for high-yield material and flashcards.
Aquifer Cases and AAFP FM questions (via free student memberships).
Amboss (for biostatistics and ethics).
YouTube Videos and a supportive Discord server.
Scores and Performance:
Users reported fluctuating scores (e.g., NBME 9: 207, NBME 10: 197) and concerns with decreasing trends (e.g., 222 to 199).
Emphasis on targeting at least 220 before taking Step 2.
A Crash Course taught by a 274-scorer is available for personalized preparation.
Methods and Opportunities:
Thorough review of incorrect answers and NBME analysis for identifying weak areas.
Starting small with topics or flashcards to build momentum.
Treating CMS forms as learning tools rather than assessments.
Using NBME scores as the most predictive for exam readiness.
Seeking community support via Discord or spiritual approaches like prayer.
Tips and Tricks:
Review core material before tackling questions to build confidence.
Use structured schedules for NBMEs and CMS forms.
Identify content vs. comprehension gaps by reviewing questions thoroughly.
Seek free or low-cost resources like student memberships for AAFP.
Leverage analogies for tough concepts (e.g., Ach shipping lane for myasthenia crisis).
Post 1: Low NBME Scores
The user expresses concern over their low NBME scores (207 on NBME 9 and 197 on NBME 10) despite finishing UWorld and reviewing incorrect questions. With only four weeks left before their Step 2 exam, they seek advice on whether to continue with more NBMEs and strategies for improving their scores.
Comment Analysis: Responses emphasize the predictive nature of NBME assessments and recommend reviewing CMS forms or core material to solidify knowledge before taking additional practice exams. Many commenters caution against sitting for the exam with current scores, suggesting aiming for at least 220 to improve performance. A mix of personal anecdotes and motivational support rounds out the advice, with one user sharing their similar experience and decision to reschedule.
Post 2: Crash Course
The post introduces a Step 2 Crash Course by a high-scorer (274) offering one-on-one tutoring and a structured, intensive review over 25–30 days for $275. The course focuses on high-yield material, leveraging PowerPoint slides and insights from "Inner Circle" resources, with limited seats to ensure personalized interaction.
Comment Analysis: Some users express interest but seek discounts for group sign-ups. One comment alleges the offer could be a scam, though others appear genuinely interested, messaging the tutor directly. The lack of significant negative feedback indicates general trust or curiosity about the service.
Post 3: Just Passed Step 1
A third-year MBBS student shares their success in passing Step 1 and seeks advice on preparing for Step 2, which they plan to take in two years.
Comment Analysis: Recommendations focus on UWorld (2–3 passes), CMS forms, and NBMEs 9–15, alongside Mehlman and Divine podcasts. One commenter mentions avoiding reliance on First Aid for Step 2, except for niche topics like glycogen and lysosomal storage diseases. The detailed preparation timelines and resources suggest that early and consistent effort is critical.
Post 4: Tachycardia Management in ACLS
The post questions whether a heart rate >150 bpm automatically qualifies as hemodynamically unstable under ACLS guidelines.
Comment Analysis: The single response provides a detailed physiological explanation of tachycardia’s impact on myocardial oxygen demand and coronary perfusion, which can make it hemodynamically significant. The technical nature of the reply underscores the importance of understanding ACLS principles in detail.
Post 5: NBME 15
The user requests a PDF of NBME 15.
Comment Analysis: The comment section is a flood of requests for the PDF, indicating high demand for free access to this resource. No responses offer a legitimate source, showcasing a common issue of material scarcity and the reliance on unofficial sharing.
Post 6: Shelf Review vs. Step 2 Review
The post seeks to understand the difference between UWorld’s Shelf Review and Step 2 Review, aside from the higher question count in the latter.
Comment Analysis: Responses agree that the differences are minimal, with Step 2 Review offering additional questions on ethics and biostatistics. One user highlights that Shelf Review contains some unique questions absent in Step 2 Review, though these are few. Overall, the practical utility of either option is affirmed.
Post 7: Biostat Review
The user asks whether UWorld’s 140+ biostat questions suffice or if purchasing the $25 biostat review is necessary.
Comment Analysis: Responses suggest that the standard UWorld questions are adequate, with Amboss biostat materials being a frequently recommended alternative. The advice reflects the general preference for resource optimization without unnecessary spending.
Post 8: Emergency Case Management Question
The post details a clinical scenario of a 15-year-old patient with hypovolemic shock after a car accident, asking for the next management step.
Comment Analysis: Most commenters identify type O, Rh-negative packed red blood cells (option E) as the correct choice, citing urgency and the inability to wait for crossmatching. The discussion also validates this approach with logical reasoning, reflecting confidence in this ACLS principle.
Post 9: Step 2 BnB Videos
The user requests a link to Boards and Beyond (BnB) videos for Step 2.
Comment Analysis: The lone comment suggests using @Boardsnbeyondbot, implying an automated system for sharing or requesting video links, but lacks further elaboration.
Post 10: Divine Interventions by Major
The user seeks a categorized list of Divine Interventions podcast episodes by specialty, particularly surgery.
Comment Analysis: A helpful comment shares a Google Spreadsheet and a link to the Divine Interventions website, which categorizes episodes by topic. This structured advice is highly actionable, emphasizing the utility of pre-organized resources to streamline preparation.
Post 11: AAFP for FM Shelf/COMAT
The user inquires about using AAFP and Aquifer cases for Family Medicine (FM) Shelf/COMAT preparation, asking if these resources require a paid subscription.
Comment Analysis: A helpful response explains that AAFP offers a free student membership that allows access to FM questions, which should be tackled after completing UWorld FM and ambulatory questions. The advice is concise and practical, ensuring clarity for other students in similar situations.
Post 12: Order of Giving Assessments
The user asks about the optimal order for taking NBMEs and UWSAs during Step 2 preparation.
Comment Analysis: A single response provides a specific sequence: NBME 9, 10, UWSA 1, NBME 11–15, UWSA 2, showcasing a logical progression from older to newer assessments. This advice aligns with the common strategy of prioritizing NBME assessments to monitor progress and pinpoint weaknesses before final practice tests.
Post 13: NBME Scores Are Decreasing
The user reports a decline in NBME scores (222 → 199) despite completing CMS forms and plans to take their Step 2 exam in a month. They seek advice on whether to postpone.
Comment Analysis: A detailed response suggests taking a break from new NBMEs to thoroughly review mistakes on the completed tests. The approach includes writing down explanations for correct and incorrect answers, identifying whether the issue lies in content knowledge or comprehension, and targeting weaknesses with CMS or Qbank sessions. The commenter highlights the importance of differentiating between confusion from vague stems and genuine gaps in understanding.
Post 14: Still No Step 2 Result
Multiple users express frustration about delayed Step 2 scores, with no results for exams taken as far back as October 26th.
Comment Analysis: Comments reflect a shared concern over the extended wait time for results, with some users speculating about delays due to score compilation or exam updates. The lack of communication from ECFMG adds to the anxiety, highlighting a recurring issue with transparency in score release processes.
Post 15: CMS Forms
The user seeks advice on which CMS forms to prioritize during preparation.
Comment Analysis: A helpful comment advises starting with form 5, as older forms may contain outdated data. For those with limited time, forms 7 and 8 are recommended for their relevance and accuracy, underscoring the need to focus on high-yield resources close to the exam date.
Post 16: How to Start Step 2 Prep
The user expresses difficulty in finding clarity to start their Step 2 preparation and mentions watching YouTube videos.
Comment Analysis: A commenter invites the user to join a Discord server offering emotional, moral, and intellectual support alongside preparation resources. This response underscores the importance of community and access to centralized resources for creating a structured study plan.
Post 17: I’m Doing Very Bad on CMS Forms
The user reports scoring around 70% (15–16 mistakes) on CMS forms and seeks advice with two months left until their exam.
Comment Analysis: A response reframes the user’s perception, suggesting CMS forms be treated as a learning tool rather than an assessment. The comment encourages reviewing incorrect answers thoroughly and using NBMEs for accurate self-assessment, emphasizing that the reported score is not as bad as perceived.
Post 18: Myasthenia Crisis
The user asks why deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) remain normal in Myasthenic Crisis (MC) despite reduced muscle strength.
Comment Analysis: Responses provide creative analogies, such as comparing the neuromuscular junction to a shipping lane, illustrating how Ach receptors remain functional enough for brief transmissions. Other comments highlight the distinction between MC and LEMS, where DTRs are absent due to reduced Ach release. This nuanced discussion aids understanding of the conditions.
Post 19: Delayed Results
The user questions whether delayed Step 2 results for earlier weeks will affect 11/7 test dates or if both sets will be released simultaneously.
Comment Analysis: Comments share anecdotal evidence of similar delays due to suspected question bank changes. One user encourages calling ECFMG, though others note that the organization rarely provides updates. The recurring issue of delayed scores highlights the lack of communication from governing bodies.
Post 20: Are Any Prometric Centers in Europe?
The user seeks help finding Prometric centers in Europe to book their Step 2 exam.
Comment Analysis: Comments suggest locations in London, Manchester, Spain, and Italy, with advice to check the Prometric website for availability. The responses are location-specific and practical, providing actionable information for stressed candidates.
Parte superior do formulário
Post 21: Rant
The user shares their struggles with starting Step 2 preparation, experiencing nervous breakdowns and self-doubt stemming from a preference for basic sciences over clinical material. They mention panic after getting only 1/5 questions correct and ask for tips to cope with stress and fear of failure.
Comment Analysis: Responses address both the emotional and practical challenges. One user suggests prayer and faith as a source of emotional resilience, emphasizing the importance of surrendering to a higher power. Another comment offers a practical approach: begin by reviewing basic material like flashcards or a text (e.g., Inner Circle) before solving questions to create an illusion of progress and build momentum. Both responses recognize the need for emotional grounding and incremental strategies to overcome inertia.
Post 22: Thiazide Diuretics and Calcium Reabsorption
The user seeks clarification on why thiazide diuretics increase calcium reabsorption while loop diuretics decrease it.
Comment Analysis: The sole comment provides a technical explanation, highlighting how thiazides block the Na-Cl symporter in the distal convoluted tubule (DCT). This leads to decreased intracellular sodium, which in turn stimulates the Na-Ca exchanger on the basolateral membrane to pump sodium into the cell while removing calcium. This process creates a calcium gradient, driving calcium reabsorption from the tubular fluid. While concise, the explanation is rooted in physiology, effectively addressing the question with clarity.